If therefore the uncircumcision keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?

Thereforeª ifª the¹ uncircumcisionª keepª° the¹ righteousnessª of the¹ law,ª shall²° notª his²¹ uncircumcisionª be countedª° forª circumcision?ª

Therefore,ª ifª the¹ vncircumcisionª keepeª° the¹ righteousnesseª of the¹ Law,ª shall²° notª his²¹ vncircumcisionª be countedª° forª Circumcision?ª

But if the uncircumcision shall keep the commandment of the law, is not uncircumcisedness reckoned to him (as) circumcision?

And if uncircumcision should keep the precepts of the law, would not that uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?

ἐὰν οὖν ἡ ἀκροβυστία τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου φυλάσσῃ, οὐχ ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται;

If-ever accordingly the-one an-extremity-stuffing-unto to-the-ones to-en-course-belongings-to of-the-one of-a-parcelee it-might-guard, not the-one an-extremity-stuffing-unto of-it into to-a-cutting-about it-shall-be-fortheed-to?